ROLE OF METROPOLITAN CORPORATION CASE LAWS SECRETS

role of metropolitan corporation case laws Secrets

role of metropolitan corporation case laws Secrets

Blog Article

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights when respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're guided via the decision from the Supreme Court inside the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing during the present case. In these types of circumstances, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is also dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

Whilst the punishment may be severe, its purpose is not solely to hunt vengeance but to discourage probable offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.

4.       Record shows that the petitioner is booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in These cases, it does, prima facie, establish that the petitioner is vulnerable to repeating the offence.

Note: Please fill any subject and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave discipline blank.

Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID needed) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts to the purpose of confirming of the individual’s date of birth.

eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is very well-settled that when looking at the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to evaluate the advantage of every one of the suitable candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to this kind of eligible candidates who are found to be most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held to become get more info senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed through the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of your respondent department.

Any court may perhaps search for to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.

Section 302 from the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be issue to your most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.

This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station due to possible health risks and dangers.

The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information being gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property can also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or simply to an stranger and section forty four(Transfer of Property Act 1882)

competent authority has determined the eligibility with the private respondents and found them to become healthy for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)

Report this page